Allan, R.W., Sanderson H., Epstein, J.I.: Correlation of minute (0.5mm or less) focus of prostate adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy with radical prostatectomy specimen: role of prostate specific antigen density. 2003, Journal of Urology, 170 (2), 370-372.
Allsbrook Jr., W.C.; Mangold, K.A.; Johnson, M.H. et al: Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist, 2001, Human Pathology, 32, 81-88.
Burchardt, M., Engers, R., Müller, M., Burchardt, T., Willers, R., Epstein, J. I., Ackermann, R., Gabbert, H. E., de la Taille, J. I., Rubin, M. A.: Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading: evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical oncoloy, 2008, 134, 1071 – 1078.
Carlson, G.D.; Calvanese, C.B.; Kahane, H.; Epstein, J.I.: Accuracy of biopsy Gleason scores from a large unropathology laboratory: use of a diagnostic protocol to minimize observer variability, 1998, Urology, 51, 525-529.
Centeno, B.A.; Zietman, A.L.; Shipley, W.U.; Sobczak, M.L.; Shipley, J.W.; Preffer, F.I.; Boyle, B.J.; Colvin, R.B.: Flow cytometric analysis of DNA ploidy, percent S-phase fraction, and total proliferative fraction as prognostic indicators of local control and survival following radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma, 1994, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 2, 309-315.
Chan, T.Y., Chan, D.Y, Stutzman, K.L., Epstein, J.I: Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors? 2001, Journal of Urology, 166 (6), 2181-2184.
Cintra, M.L.; Billis, A.: Histologic grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: intraobserver reproducibility of the Mostofi, Gleason and Böcking grading systems, 1991, International Urology and Nephrology, 23(5), 449-454.
Cupp, M.R., Bostwick, D.G., Myers, R.P., Oesterling, J.E.: The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis, 1995, Journal of Urology, 153 (5), 1543-1548.
Dong, F., Kattan, M.W., Steyerberg, E.W., Jones, J.S., Stephenson, A.J., Schröder, F.H., Klein, E.A.: Validation of pretreatment nomograms for predicting indolent prostate cancer, 2008, Journal of Urology, 180 (1), 150-154.
Elgamal, A. A., Van Poppel, H. P., Van der Voorde, W.M., Van Dorpe, J. A., Oyen, R. H., Baert, L. V.: Impalpable invisible stage T1c prostate cancer: characteristics and clinical relevance in 100 radical prostatectomy specimens – a different view. Journal of Urology, 1997, 157 (1), 244-250.
Egevad, L.: Reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostate cancer can be improved by the use of reference images, 2001, Urology, 57, 291-295.
Engelhard, M.: PSA-Kinetiken als Indikationsstellung zur Prostatastanzbiopsie, Med. Diss. Universität Düsseldorf, in Vorbereitung, 2011.
Eposti, P.L.: Cytologic malignancy grading of prostatic carcinoma by transrectal aspiration biopsy, 1971, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 5, 199-205.
Epstein., J.I., Walsh, P.C., Carmichael, M., Brendler, C.B.: Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage 1c) prostate cancer, 1994, Journal of the American Medical Association, 271 (5), 368-374.
Epstein, J.I., Chan, D.W., Sokoll, LJ., Walsh, P.C., Cox, J., L., Rittenhouse, H., Wolfert, R., Carter, H.B.: Nonpalpable stage T1c prostate cancer: prediction of insignificant disease using free/total prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsy findings, 1998, Journal of Urology, 160 (6), 2407-2411.
Epstein, J.I., Walsh, P.C., Akingba, G., Carter, H.B.: The significance of prior benign needle biopsies in men subsequentially diagnosed with prostate cancer, 1999, Journal of Urology, 162 (5), 1649-1652.
Epstein, J.I.; Amin, M.; Boccon-Gibod, L.; Egevad, L.; Humphrey, P.A.; Mikuz, G.; Newling, D.; Nilsson, S.; Sakr, W.; Srigley, J.R.; Wheeler, T.M.; Montironi, R. : Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens, 2005, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology Supplement, 216, 34-63.
Gleason, D.F.; Mellinger, G.T.; The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group: Prediction of prognosis for prostatic for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging, 1974, Journal of Urology, 111, 58-64.
Goto, Y., Ohori, M., Arakawa, A., Kattan, M.W., Wheeler, T.M., Scardino, P.T.: Distinguishing clinically imortant from unimportant prostate cancers before treatment: value of systematic biopsies. Journal of Urology, 1996, 156 (3), 1059-1063.
Helpap, B.; Egevad, L.: Clinical insignificance of prostate cancer: are there morphological findings?, 2009, Urologe A, 48(2), 170-174.
Helap, B, Hartmann, A. , Wernert, N.: Anleitung zur pathologisch-anatomischen Diagnostik von Prostatatumoren des Bundesverbandes Deutscher Pathologen e.V. und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e.V., Version 2.0, März 2011. www.prostata-shg.de.
Hirano, D., Werahera, P.N., Crawford, E.D., Lucia, M.S., DeAntoni, E.P., Miller, G.J.: Morphological analysis and classification of latent prostate cancer using a 3-dimensional computer algorithm: analysis of tumor volume, grade, tumor doubling time and lifetime expectancy, 1998, Journal of Urology, 159 (4), 1265-1269.
Horninger, W., Rogatsch, H., Reissigl., A., Volgger, H., Klocker, H., Hobisch, A., Bartsch, G.: Correlation between preoperative predictors and pathologic features in radical prostatectomy specimens in PSA-based screening, 1999, Prostate, 40 (1), 56-61.
Iczkowski, K.A.; Bostwick, D.G.: The pathologist as optimist: cancer grade deflation in prostatic needle biopsies, 1998, American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 22, 1169-1170.
Irwin, M.B., Trapasso, J.G.: Identification of insignificant prostate cancers: analysis of preoperative parameters. Urology, 1994, 44 (6), 862-867.
Kristiansen, G.: Was bedeutet der neue Gleason-Score für den Kliniker, 2009
Lee., A.K., Doytchinova, T., Chen., M.H., Renshaw, A.A., Weinstein, M., Richie, J.P., D`Amico, A.V.: Can the core length involved with prostate cancer identify clinically insignificant disease in low risk patients diagnosed on the basis of a single positive core? 2003, Urologic Oncology, 21 (2), 123-127.
Lessells, A.M.; Burnett, R.A.; Howatson, S.R. et al.: Observer variability in the histopathological reporting of needle biopsy specimens of the prostate, 1997, Human Pathology, 28, 646-649.
Leung, C.S., Zbieranowski, I., Demers, J., Murray, D.: DNA image cytometry of prostatic Carcinoma: A comparison of needle core biopsy and subsequent prostatectomy specimens. 2004, Modern Pathology, / (2), 195-199
Loeb, S., Roehl, K.A., Thaxton, C.S., Catalona, W.J.: Combined prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy features to predict “clinically insignificant” prostate cancer, 2008, Urology, 72 (1), 143-147.
Miyake, H., Sakai, I., Harada, K., Hara, I., Eto, H.: Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease, 2005, International Journal of Urology, 12 (3), 270.274.
Mikami, Y.; Manabe, T.; Epstein, J.I. et al: Accuracy of Gleason grading by practicing pathologists and impact of education on improving agreement, 2003, Human Pathology, 34, 658-665.
Ochiari, A., Troncoso, P., Chen, M. E., Lloreta, J., Babian, R. J.: The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing mutisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management. Journal of Urology, 2005, 174 (6), 2164 – 2168.
Recker, F., Kwiatkowski, M.K., Huber, A., Stamm, B., Lehmann, K., Tscholl, R.: Prospective detection of clinically relevant prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen range 1 to 3 ng/ml combined with free-to-total ratio 20% or less: the Aarau experience, 2001, Journal of Urology, 166 (3), 851-855.
Sokoloff, M. H., Yang, X. J., Fumo, M., Mhoon, D., Brendler, C. B.: Ccharacterizing prostatic adenocarcinoma in men with a serum prostate specific antigen level of < 4.0 ng/ml. British Journal of Urology International, 2004, 93 (4), 499-502.
Tavares, A. S., Costa, J., De Carvalho, A., Reis, M.: Tumour ploidy and prognosis in carcinomas of the bladder. British Journal of Cancer, 1966, 20, 438 – 441.
Terris, M.K., Haney, D.J., Johnstone, I.M., McNeal, J.E., Stamey, T.A.: Prediction of prostate cancer volume using prostate-specific antigen levels, transrectal ultrasound, and systematic sextant biopsies, 1995, Urology, 45 (1), 75-80.
Tils, M.: DNA-Malignitäts-Gradierung Beim Prostatakarzinom – Reproduzierbarkeit, Korrelation mit dem Gleason-Score und dem Staging . Med. Diss., Universität Düsseldorf, in Vorbereitung, 2011.
Uemura, H., Hushino, K., Sasaki, T., Mioshi, Y., Ishiguro, H., Inayama, Y, Kubeto, Y.: Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy. British Journal of Urology, September 2008
UICC International Union Against Cancer, Hrsg.: Wittekind, Ch.; Meyer, H.-J., Bootz, F.: TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren, Springer 2002, 6.Auflage.
Visakorpi, T.; Kallioniemi, O.-P.; Paronen, I.Y.I.; Isola, J.J.; Heikkinen, A.I.; Koivula, T.A.: Flow cytometric analysis of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction from prostatic carcinomas: implications for prognosis and response to endocrine therapy, 1991, British Journal of Cancer, 64, 578-582.